What is war? According to the dictionary, the primary definition of war is: Strife (especially between countries) involving military or naval or air attacks. This definition is actually not too terribly incorrect, but there is one word in this definition that is totally out of place and blatantly invalid. Can you guess which word this is? The word is countries. Contrary to popular opinions of the brainwashed masses, wars are not battles or fights between countries, but rather battles and fights between individuals who just happen to be leaders of countries. This is not a minor distinction, it is an extremely important starting point on our journey into the depths of Forbidden Truth. Countries are led by individuals. These individuals, known as "leaders", who carry titles such as president, prime minister, king, etc..., are almost universally mentally deranged and power-crazed, as well as sociopathically evil. The only way a person can attain a position of supreme leadership within a deranged and malevolent society, is for the person to be deranged and malevolent. This Truth is applicable to all types of political systems, democratic, communist, totalitarian, etc... I will be speaking more about this in my Political Systems essay, but the fact is that so-called "democracies", assuming that they have been built and structured along genocidally immoral lines, such as america has been built, are even more certain to only empower mentally ill and evil people to be their supreme leaders, than is the case with a communist or totalitarian political system.

Wars are criminal acts of violence, undertaken not by "countries", but by individual human beings who just happen to also be supreme leaders of either an official government, or a very popular cultural/ideological movement. Lets talk about weapons for a moment. A poor person likely only has a knife, that he can use as a weapon. A wealthier person may have a gun, that he can use as a weapon. The leader of a street gang or an organized crime organization, likely has an even more useful weapon at his disposal, namely, other human beings that he can employ to commit violence on his behalf, upon his command. Now, the supreme leader of a government has the most powerful weapon of all at his disposal. No, not nuclear or biological weapons, not fighter jets or cluster bombs, or the like. He has the entire body of citizen-slaves who live within his society, at his disposal, to use as weapons. Understand that human beings are the most powerful and useful weapon of all. Within the existing dynamic of war, citizens enlisted in the military are not "soldiers". Soldiers is simply a word that has been created to cover-up the Truth. These citizens are in fact nothing more and nothing less than weapons. They are used as weapons, by the leaders of their society/government, leaders who are homicidally enraged, mentally deranged, and power-crazed, which are the reasons why and how they have sought and attained their supreme leadership positions within the society.

Leaders of societies choose to undertake wars, for either personal or political reasons. Usually for both personal and political reasons, but always for at least one of these two reasons. Personal reasons include homicidal rage, sadism, a need to overcome feelings of personal worthlessness and impotence, a desire for vengeance based upon the suppressed suffering and victimization that they, as individuals, have experienced in their pasts, mentally deranged ideological obsessions, brainwashed addictions to the god myth as well as to false perceptions of justice, and a personal obsession with attaining limitless power and control over as many human beings as they possibly can. Political reasons include a need to appease their citizen-slaves, to satiate the suppressed bloodlust of their citizen-slaves, to divert public attention from domestic problems and complaints, to terrorize their citizen-slaves into feeling as though they must support his existing regime in order to remain secure, or even to remain alive. All of these "reasons" are individual in nature, they represent the will of an individual, the leader of a government or of a major cultural/ideological movement. They are not governmental reasons. They are individual reasons, put forth by individuals who just happen to be the supreme leaders of societies/governments. You must understand this point: The soldier in a war is exactly the same as a gun, in a two-person shoot-out. In the two person shoot-out, the guns used are weapons. In a war, all soldiers are weapons. They are not human beings. They are slaves with no sentient will, being used as weapons by the insane and evil leaders of their societies.

When an individual person uses a gun to commit a crime, the gun is his weapon. The gun is not alive however, so it cannot suffer any consequences. When the leader of a government uses human beings to commit crimes, those human beings are his weapons. Those human beings are alive, they can and do suffer consequences, and therefore all governmental and ideological leaders who choose to engage in wars, are committing genocide upon their own citizens. The structure of all governments, is exactly the same as the structure of vicious street gangs and organized crime families, only on a much larger scale of malice. Governmental leaders are evil and insane, and they use their citizen-slaves as weapons, to try and cope with their own individual rage, hate, terror, obsessions, and personal need for vengeance through violence. This is a universal Truth, it is not subject to a case by case analysis. Every single leader of a society who chooses to engage in war, regardless of whether or not they claim to have been "attacked first", or to "only be defending our nation", is in reality undertaking an individual act of personal rage, simply by choosing to participate in the war. Very often in schools and workplaces, if there are two extremely enraged individuals, they will specifically seek each other out and engage in fights, because they subconsciously recognize that they can help each other to meet their own needs to express their rage and hate upon others, specifically, upon each other. This dynamic applies to national leaders as well. Leaders who are desperately eager to release their personal rage and hate, while maintaining the illusion of moral decency to both themselves and their citizen-slaves, will specifically seek each other out, and goad each other with repeated provocations, for the intentional purpose for attempting to justify declaring war, sometimes on a conscious level, other times on a subconscious level. Very often, a leader of a society will privately and literally fall to his knees in joy, either physically or psychologically, often in both ways, upon learning that another societal leader has declared war upon "his" nation. Why should such an occurrence invoke massive joy? Because it allows the homicidally enraged leader to "declare war" back, while maintaining the illusion of possessing the higher level of moral legitimacy, via a claim of "we are only defending ourselves and our way of life." It's like being given both moral and legal permission to mass murder a million human beings, literally the ultimate wet dream for a homicidally enraged human being. So, what we have are the most evil and mentally ill leaders attaining power within the most evil and diseased societies, then seeking each other out for the individual purpose of expressing their homicidal rage through war, within the illusion of moral legitimacy.

Genghis Khan, Julius Caesar, Idi Amin, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., Osama bin-Laden, are all examples of some of the most evil, mentally ill, and homicidally enraged supreme leaders of the modern era. Although perhaps Khan and Caesar ruled a bit too long ago to qualify for inclusion in the modern era. These leaders of societies/governments deliberately sought out war with other societal leaders, for personally cathartic reasons. In point of fact, all wars are undertaken by individual leaders for either personal or political reasons, the above list simply includes the names of some of the most overtly homicidal and deranged leaders of all time.

America, england, the old soviet union, israel, germany, some of the arabian nations, some of the african nations, have been some of the primary warmongers of recent decades. This is because these countries were founded and developed along genocidally evil lines, and continue to have the most inferior and diseased societal structures in the entire world. These countries have a history of genocide, in many cases, such as america, they were founded, they came into existence, purely as the result of a genocidal attack upon a sovereign, independent society, that they chose to launch and undertake. These societies possess insane religious ideologies, and are filled with mentally deranged citizens who are obsessed with violence, rage, and vengeance, thus guaranteeing that every political leader they elect or otherwise allow to come to power, will share the same immense, suppressed homicidal rage that the average, typical, mainstream citizen feels within their True Reality. This is why we have specific wars that never seem to end, two or more societies that are ultra-diseased find each other, establish a toxic relationship with each other, and despite their claims to want to "end" the war that they are engaged in with each other, the reality is that they do not want the war to end, neither side usually wants the war to end. They, and when I say they I refer to both the supreme leaders of the society and to the average, typical, mainstream masses of citizen-slave as well, want to continue the war, so that they can cathartically shed the blood of a demonized enemy. The war ritual is almost always mutually agreeable to both parties, both governments specifically desire and choose to engage in the war ritual with each other. America had a long-time, overtly deranged war with the soviet union. When this war finally came to an end, america was not at all happy, not the citizenry and not the leadership. In fact there was extreme distress, never publicly or consciously admitted to, of course, within the insane and evil american culture, because a "favorite demon" had been lost, an imaginary demon upon whom generations of homicidally enraged americans had directed their suppressed and denied homicidal rage, while maintaining the insane illusion of moral justification and superiority. Within just a few years, american societal leaders knew they had to find other societies and other societal leaders to demonize, and so they deliberately sought out, courted war against via deliberate provocation, imposed themselves upon, and provoked "wars" with vietnam, korea, panama, iran, iraq, somalia, pakistan, and now afghanistan, among many others. That america has been by far the most genocidally warmongering nation on planet earth over the past 20 years, over the past 100 years, and over the entire history of america existing as a sovereign nation, is undeniable to any rational thinker who examines the historical facts of war.

The degree of disease that is rooted within a society, can be very accurately assessed by looking at how many wars the society has been engaged in, and for what percentage of time during their history, the society has been actively engaged in warlike activity against another society. The more wars the society is engaged in, and the larger the percentage of time they are actively engaged in war, the more perverse, diseased, and inferior the society is. America is absolutely at the head of the list, on both of these statistics. Two very important points: From a Truth-based perspective, it makes absolutely no difference which country claims to have been "provoked", which country claims to have had war declared upon it, and to only be defending itself. War is a societal policy that requires mutual agreement from both societies/countries, in order to occur. There is no way that a war can occur, unless the evil and diseased leaders of both societies, agree to engage in a war. The only exception to this rule is when an invading group of humans, usually not directly representing an existing government, but rather seeking to seize territory in order to establish a totally new regime, chooses to commit unprovoked genocide, such as the european drifters who stumbled across the north american continent chose to do. Furthermore, war is retaliatory by nature and by design, which means that unless we are talking about a government coming into existence via a genocidal overthrow of an existing societal structure, such as how america came into existence, there is no legitimacy to the argument that "the other side declared war on us, so we are only defending ourselves." If the other side did "officially" declare war upon your side, they only did so because "your" societal leader, and your society as a whole, has been goading, provoking, daring, and inciting the "enemy" societal leader and his citizen-slaves, for the specific purpose of wanting to cause a war to occur, while still trying to retain the ability to claim a moral high ground, by getting the other side to "officially" declare war first, against your society. Don't you idiots ever stop to think about why some societies/nations never seem to get directly involved in wars, for example Iceland, Costa Rica, etc... It's not because they are "worthless" countries, and it's not because they are feared by other nations, and it's not because they have superior militaries. It's because these societies are Superior societies, who refuse to participate in the "game" of war, as practiced by inferior societies. Inferior societies seek each other out, making a mutual, subconscious decision to engage in war, a decision made by the leaders of these inferior societies, to provide to themselves and to you, the homicidally enraged citizenry, the emotional pleasure and cathartic enjoyment of ritualized mass murder, genocide, and brutalization of a demonized enemy. It is a mutually agreeable decision that both inferior and diseased societies make, to engage in a war, although of course the leaders and the citizenry would both vehemently deny and ridicule this Forbidden Truth, if it was suggested to them.

Second extremely important point, we must recognize that the most evil societies of the world will be constantly engaged in either fighting actual wars, preparing to fight future wars, and demonizing other societies/countries in order to incite, arouse, and foment public support for the "next" war. The leaders of these societies have absolutely no interest in ever gaining "peace" for their society/citizenry. The thought of "peace breaking out" within their society, terrifies them. This is because they realize that their nation is filled with homicidally enraged torture victims, and unless provided with a steady diet of "demonized foreign societies" to hate and direct their rage against, societal leaders are in mortal terror that their flock of homicidal torture victims will somehow find the rationality and insight to recognize that it is their own society which deserves to be the target of their rage. At the same time, these societies still need to justify their wars on a pretense of morality and legitimacy, as well as to "claim victory" at some point in time, pretending to joyously celebrate the "end of the war", even though in reality societal leaders are already eagerly planning for and attempting to provoke a new war, as soon as they realize that the current war they are engaged in, is nearing a likely end. We must remember that governments absolutely can and do engage in genocidal wars, without ever publicly or officially admitting that they are in the middle of committing genocide via war. A perfect example of this is the 11-12 year old war that america has been undertaking against iraq. For the past 10+ years, america has been engaging in a constant, ongoing, brutally vicious war against iraq. This is a genocidal war that has been underway for over a decade as of today, the year 2001, and yet there is no genuine acknowledgment or admission within either the government, the media, or the popular culture of america, that this is an 11 year old war of almost incredibly evil genocide. At least 500,000 children in iraq, children under the age of 18, have died as a direct and sole result of the genocidal attack that america has undertaken against Iraq, over the past decade. This is deliberate, intentional, willful, child genocide. The notion that a society such as america, deliberately killing 500,000 children, within the current time frame, meaning today, as an ongoing policy, in order to satiate the suppressed bloodlust of american citizen-slaves, has any type of moral authority to even comment upon, much less try to interfere with, the policies and ideologies of other nations, is ludicrous. America is by far the most immoral, diseased, overtly malevolent, genocidal society/government on planet earth at the current time, and a wonderful argument can be made that over the past 300+ years, america has consistently held this perverse position, year after year, for the past 300+ years. America has been engaged in an utterly immoral, genocidal war against Iraq, deliberately killing 500,000+ children. And yet because the american government refuses to admit or publically acknowledge that this is a war, the pathetic, brainwashed sheeple who constitute the citizen-slaves of america, do not consider this war to be a war. Beautiful illustration here, of the literally incredible degree of stupidity and hatred of Truth, that constitutes normal thinking among you humans.

I need to emphasize just how powerful the enticement to undertake war is, among ultra-diseased societies. On one level, you have the masses of victimized, enraged citizen-slaves, constantly and desperately searching for some group of fellow human beings to demonize, hate, and direct their homicidal rage upon. On a totally different level, you have the supreme leaders of these societies, who could not have become the leaders of these societies unless they shared the same individual rage and need to cathartically direct their hate upon others, that the masses of citizen-slaves have. So, the leaders of these societies have a personal need/desire to demonize, blame, and direct homicidal rage upon, other human beings. In addition however, they also have a tremendous political need/desire to do this exact same thing. They were in fact elected, or otherwise allowed to come to power, specifically because the citizens, on a subconscious level, want, desire, and expect their leader to instruct them to direct their rage and hate against specific classes, ethnic groups, religious groups, or other societies. This is a double-tiered structure of immense insanity and evil. Even if the societal leader might be interested in trying to transcend his own personal homicidal rage, within the policy structure of how he rules the nation, it is almost impossible for him to decline to appease the immense political pressure to undertake wars, that the vast majority of all citizens within his society, are subconsciously demanding. And even if he is interesting in trying to resist the political pressure to engage in wars, he faces a tremendous emotional hurdle in terms of overcoming his own personal malice, rage, insanity, and lust for personally cathartic vengeance through violence. Now, if the leader somehow allows or chooses to specifically instruct his citizen-slaves to direct their rage and hate domestically, upon a class of people, an ethnic group, a religious group, that is living within his own society as citizens, he is taking a tremendous risk, the risk of destabilizing the entire nation, provoking riots, protests, and other domestic unrest. It is thousands of times safer for the leader, on practical, political, and emotional/moralistic levels, to incite and encourage widespread hatred and demonization of a foreign society, as opposed to a group or class of people living within his own society, because the risk of domestic unrest, the risk of a "war" erupting within his own society, is rendered virtually nil, due to the fact that the vast majority of you diseased creatures eagerly "unite" and insanely agree to direct your rage and hate upon a foreign society, ideology, or group, at the drop of a hat. You are in fact eager to accept whatever foreign demonization your societal leaders choose to provide you with, because you find it morally easier to justify directing your homicidal rage upon "foreign devils", creatures who look human, but whose perceived physical, lifestyle, religious, and ideological differences from you, are constantly being emphasized and drilled into your brainwashed, shallow minds, by your societal leaders.

In capitalistic societies especially, wars are nothing more than product commercials, of the type you see in any commercial television broadcast. You are being sold a product, the product is morally justifiable mass murder. You are the consumer, your society is the vendor. This product has to be packaged, marketed, and promoted well, the job of the commercial is to make you feel good, make you feel that this pending mass murder, which you are subconsciously desperate to experience as a way to cathartically relieve your suppressed rage and hate, is morally justifiable, legal, good, necessary, and an appropriate type of legal murder for you to embrace. Your society demonizes it's chosen "enemy" to you, trying to convince you that the enemy is evil, hurts women, hurts children, poses a threat to you and your loved ones. The reality of course is that you own society is certainly hundreds if not thousands of times more evil, causes thousands of times more harm to women and children living within your society, and poses a far greater, ongoing, daily threat to brutally victimize you, than any foreign society ever could. Your governments undertake a media and a public relations campaign, using every available tool of brainwashing and manipulation of reality perception, to demonize the chosen foreign enemy, as a trial balloon method of gauging whether or not they can foment enough consensus rage within the society, to justify undertaking and initiating an actual war against the chosen enemy society. In the vast majority of cases, assuming the societal leaders have firmly decided and determined that they wish to engage in a war with a specific enemy, they have very little if any difficulty in winning overwhelming public support for the initiation of war in a short period of time, since the vast majority of citizen-slaves are constantly filled with suppressed homicidal rage, and constantly looking for some type of a morally justified outlet for this homicidal rage, that they depend upon their evil and diseased society to provide to them. Hence we have hunting, abortion, the death penalty, euthanasia, and of course war as well, all societally legitimized forms of absolutely brutal, immoral, mass murder. In general, the more types of mass murder that a society chooses to officially legitimize and partake of, the more diseased and evil the society is. So it's no surprise that american societal leaders proudly embrace and hug to their maggot-filled bosoms war, abortion, the death penalty, hunting, etc...

Lets understand, even as we face up to the Forbidden Truth that all human societies currently in existence are evil and diseased, that there are some major differences between the most diseased societies on planet earth, and the least diseased societies on planet earth. Some societies are much more evil and diseased than other societies. Some are almost constantly engaged in war, constantly killing their own babies via abortion, constantly killing their own tortured victim-creations via a "death penalty", constantly killing other species of life that are morally superior to them for pleasure and for "sport", constantly promoting the genocidal torture of every child born into their society. This is america. Some other societies are far less deranged and diseased in structure, they almost never engage in war, they outlaw abortion, they do not murder their torture victims via a death penalty, etc... And yet even the most benign society currently in existence on this planet, still engages in genocidal murder and ritualistic victimization of it's own citizen-slaves, to some degree. It is important to recognize that there are major and significant differences between the most evil societies on earth, when compared to the "least" evil societies on planet earth. But it is even more important to understand and accept the profound Truth that every human governmental society as of today, is absolutely evil and immoral.

One of the primary ways that war is marketed and legitimized to you citizen-slaves, is as a battle between "good and evil". Your society instructs you that it is good, that you are good, and that the "enemy" that it is choosing to target is evil, and that the other society, or at the very least the soldiers fighting for the other society, are evil. This is an utterly ridiculous notion! That your society is evil, is undeniable, because all societies are evil and immoral. So, if your society was even pretending to have an interest in honesty and Truth, it would use the claim of being "less evil", rather than good and righteous. But of course we already understand that Truth, all Truth, is the mortal enemy of your societies, to be shunned, ignored, rejected at all times and in all circumstances. Regardless of whether or not a society that chooses to engage in a war might be able to make a theoretically legitimate argument that it might be somewhat "less evil" in terms of ideological policy as an abstract concept, than the enemy society, the undeniable Truth is that every society inflicts the greatest degree of harm, trauma, victimization, and suffering, upon it's own citizens. Please reread this last, red print, underlined sentence, because it is extremely important and cuts to the very heart of Forbidden Truth on this issue of war. Every society inflicts the greatest degree of harm, upon it's own citizen-slaves. Not upon the citizens of some other society or nation, but upon their own citizen-slaves. The fact that most citizens are unable to recognize, understand, perceive, and accept the fact that their own society is brutally oppressing and harming them, is a beautiful illustration of how well ideologically false societal brainwashing works for societies, in winning the blind, insane devotion of their citizens. But if we, the few of us who courageously seek Forbidden Truth, can recognize and accept the fact that "our" society deliberately inflicts far greater harm upon us than any foreign society inflicts or is interested in inflicting upon us, the entire charade upon which societies build their false legitimizations of why they need to go to war, collapses. War is marketed to all citizen-slaves, by every society, by each side, as being justified because "your" side is the good, righteous, justified side. War is marketed as a battle between a good side, your side, and a bad side, the enemy side. And yet the Truth is that there cannot be a good and righteous side because there is no good or righteous society/government on planet earth. Even more importantly, "your" side, the side which claims to be the good and righteous side, has deliberately inflicted far more harm, abuse, and victimization upon you, than the decreed "bad and immoral" enemy side has ever inflicted upon you. So how can you align yourself with the side that lies to you, is evil and immoral, and has inflicted far more harm upon you than the "enemy" side has inflicted upon you? It makes no logical sense!

The only argument left to be made, is that the "enemy" side wants to kill or torture you in a horrific way, and at least your own society is not immediately intending or planning to directly murder you outright, or physically torture you to death, so you must support this "lesser of two evils". Is there any legitimacy to this argument? No! The fact is, the "enemy" society in a war is only interested in killing or torturing you, because you are a member of the "other" society, the society that has declared war upon them and from their perspective, is trying to torment and kill them. If you were to choose to "defect", to sincerely abandon your current society/government, renounce your current government, and place yourself at the mercy of the "enemy" society, you likely would not be killed. You might well have to adopt to a different lifestyle, you certainly will suffer and be victimized to a degree by your "new" society, but if you can open your blind eyes, you would see that you are already being brutally victimized by your current society/government, and so the victimization that your new society/government would inflict upon you, would be nothing new and more than likely comparable to or milder than the level of current victimization you are experiencing. Even the nazi's, whose entire ideological doctrine was built upon racial superiority, would not have likely genocidally murdered the members of societies that their ideological doctrine decreed to be inferior, if these people, as individuals, would have sincerely embraced and honored the nazi regime, the nazi ideology, and nazi leaders. Yes, they likely would have made these people work at menial jobs, in slave-labor situations, but every government and every societal leadership group, is more interested in winning over the sincere, loyal devotion of as many human beings as it can, than it is in murdering them. It can only justify murdering them, if it can philosophically argue that the foreign society or group poses a threat to them. Rejecting the legitimacy and the claims of superiority of the regime, obviously meets this threat criteria. The bottom line is, there is no government or society worth "going to war" for, worth trying to defend and risk your life for, because every society is evil and immoral, and your own society has inflicted far more harm upon you personally, than the "decreed enemy" society has already, or is likely in the future, to inflict upon you. In point of fact, your own society is threatening to murder you, needlessly endangering your life, clearly increasing the chances that you will be murdered, when it instructs/compels you to join it's military and fight in a war.

Lets understand that if two societies declare war upon each other, and one side captures either "enemy" soldiers or civilians from the other side, it is very likely they will try to use their captured enemy humans as bargaining chips and may torture/murder them, as a way to send a message and make these members of the demonized enemy examples of what the other members of the enemy, who are still trying to mass murder their side, will face. This is perfectly natural and does not contradict the fact that the "enemy" society only kills you, because you, or members of your society, are overtly and currently involved in an effort to kill members of their society, and in fact to totally destroy their society and government, in most cases. Of course it is "unfair" for the enemy society to murder you, if you sincerely renounce the society that is attacking them, and sincerely align yourself with their society. But even under these circumstances, you need to understand that it is your own society/government that is primarily to blame, because your society chose to engage in a genocidal war against this enemy society. In many cases of course, sincere defectors are welcomed with open arms, even by the enemy, even in an ongoing war, even if the defector was a citizen of and member of the very government and society that is continuing to attempt to destroy their society and government. Understand this fundamental Truth: Your society and government has deliberately harmed and victimized you. It is evil and immoral. It does not deserve your support, loyalty, or allegiance, much less to gain control of your physical body and mind, for the purpose of getting you to try and murder complete strangers on it's behalf, via the diseased war ritual. And you have no legitimate moral, ethical, ideological, or intellectual right or reason to align yourself with the society that has victimized you more than any other society, or to agree to mass murder complete strangers on behalf of this evil society. Understand that in all my comments above, I am not singling out any society or government. All of the above Truths are equally applicable, for example, for members of american society, members of afghanistan society, members of finland society, etc... The personal right to commit individual, True Reality based murder that involves personal choice that carries no "orders" or instructions or directions from your society, is far more morally legitimate, rational, and personally justifiable, than the decreed "right" that your society gives you, to mass murder specific, complete strangers. on it's behalf, via the insane structure of war. The above Truth is not an "advocacy of murder", it is a declaration of Truth. No society that chooses to practice and engage in war, has any morally legitimate legal authority to condemn or punitively punish individual citizen-slaves who may commit "unsanctioned" types of murders, because war itself is a totally immoral and unjustifiable form of murder, and it is not only decreed legal, but overtly practiced by most societies and governments, particularly within the most evil and diseased of societies.

Now, lets be clear on the fact that leaders of human governments/societies are themselves tortured victim-creations, of the societies that they are born into and raised up within. Even though the policies and doctrines of governments and societies absolutely must be seen and declared to be evil and perverse, no such labels should be applied to individual human beings who happen to be leaders of governments and societies. They are victims themselves, and they deserve no personal condemnation or demonization of any kind. All criminals are victims of society. Leaders of governments are criminals, they undertake criminal, immoral acts, in reflection of their own True Reality and the maliciously immoral design structure of their societies, that has been imposed upon them and implanted within their conscious and subconscious perceptions of reality. They are not to blame, as individuals. They must be seen and treated as being the victims of society that they are. The fact that they have assumed leadership positions within the society, in no way negates their status of being created torture victims of society. The criminal deserves absolutely no personal condemnation or punitive punishment. Society creates all of it's criminals, and bears equal responsibility for each and every created victim, there is no legitimacy to the notion that a criminal who happens to become a supreme leader of a society, loses some or all of his victimhood status. Nobody and nothing can strip a victim of his True Reality, of being a victim.

It is no surprise that the vast majority of individuals who become supreme leaders are obsessed with their images. They are power-crazed, desperately eager to exert domination and control over others, while at the same time equally desperate to shape and mold all public perceptions of their image. In particular, they are determined to extinguish and destroy any hint of personal vulnerability or victimization, from their public image, persona, and known life history. This is why you almost never read or hear about the childhood victimization, in fact torture, that virtually all societal leaders throughout all of human history, including in the present time of course, have been subjected to. Just as virtually all children try to keep their abuse and victimization secret, especially if committed by Sacred Family Unit members, politicians, aspiring politicians, and all societal/governmental leaders go to incredible efforts and lengths to hide the facts of their abuse and victimization, throughout their entire lives, even after they leave public office, in the case of elected leaders. Nevertheless, the fact remains that all societal leaders are victims of extreme childhood abuse and trauma. It takes a tremendous amount of journalistic effort to uncover such facts of abuse, and with some supreme leaders, the abuse is never uncovered. So I wish to extend my extreme thanks to the investigative reporters and journalists who have gone the extra mile to uncover some of the facts listed below, while at the same time I must of course condemn the mainstream media mercilessly, for failing to properly air, report upon, and focus upon the individual facts of supreme leader abuse listed below, as well as the psychologically and intellectually valid Truth of how societal leaders undertake wars as a way to claim personal, cathartic vengeance for the suffering, abuse, trauma, and victimization that they themselves have personally endured, in their lives. I will be providing several reference URL's, for the below quotes, after listing the quotes themselves.

"Bill Clinton's alcoholic father was so violent toward his mother that Clinton recalls him firing a gun at his mother when he was five, and little Billy twice had to stop real violence when Roger threatened to kill Virginia. His stepfather physically abused him during his drunken rages, and his grandmother, who was his primary caretaker in his early years while his mother was elsewhere, had a "fierce temper" and undoubtedly used a whip on him as she had done on his mother when she was a child. Besides this physical abuse, Clinton was also a rejected child, whose mother left him as an infant for two years with her mother while she moved to another city to learn nursing and then routinely left him while she gambled as he grew up. "I was raised in that sort of culture where you put on a happy face, and you didn't reveal your pain and agony," Bill Clinton said.

With John F. Kennedy there was an intimate emotional link between his sexual addiction--requiring almost daily conquests of mistresses and prostitutes--and his equally compulsive need for military conquests. The same is true of Clinton. He has many of the characteristics of what Robert Tucker calls the "warfare personality"--self-dramatization, extreme narcissism, repeated feelings of conspiracies against him by enemies and an ability to call for a great Crusade that will defeat Evil abroad and cleanse the world of its sinfulness. I would only add to these: a deep well of loneliness, frequent revenge fantasies and an ability to dissociate. It should not have surprised us when he ordered the Cuban invasion and risked incinerating millions of Americans with Russian nuclear missiles during his Cuban embargo, saying, "If Khrushchev wants to rub my nose in the dirt, it's all over." In fact, it turns out that it was Kennedy's taunting of the Russians with a 1962 "practice invasion" exercise near Cuba that actually pushed Khrushchev into putting his missiles into Cuba in the first place. A typical case of provoking an enemy can be shown for the actions of John F. Kennedy in the Cuban Missile Crisis, which we earlier examined briefly. JFK's childhood was typically abusive, dominated by his mother's emotional distancing of him--"She was never there when we really needed her...[She] never really held me and hugged me. Never."--and her brutality, battering John with "hairbrushes, coat hangers, belts and shoes [and] once slapping young Bobby's face so viciously that she punctured his eardrum and split his lip." The result in JFK was a phallic-narcissistic personality focused on conquering women in daily assignations and a lifetime of venereal disease [and] a steady diet of mood-altering drugs. Claiming a mythical "missile gap" with the Russians, Kennedy was elected President to "get America moving again" after the peaceful Eisenhower Fifties, and soon authorized the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba over the objections of most experts who said it would fail, telling his aides he "wasn't going to be ‘chicken.'" The resulting failure was taken by him as a personal humiliation, for which he needed revenge. He authorized Operation Mongoose, various assassination attempts against Castro, including using the Mafia, but success evaded him. By 1962, Kennedy decided to regain his potency by invading Cuba with U.S. forces. He told the military to prepare for a U.S. invasion of the island and asked his staff to formulate a pretext that would give an appearance of a Cuban attack on a U.S. airline that would justify it. But war with a small neighbor would not be enough; Kennedy moved to make certain the Russians would be involved in the war. On January 31, 1962, he asked Khrushchev's son-in-law, Aleksei Adzhubei, to meet with him and, in order to humiliate the Russians as he felt humiliated, told him he was preparing to attack Cuba like Russia attacked Hungary. Despite the fact that 100 million Americans lay in the range of the Russian missiles--and despite the opinion of his staff that they made no military difference at all because nuclear missiles on Russian submarines had long been stationed a few miles off Cuba--Kennedy instituted a naval embargo and prepared for a full-scale attack on Cuba, risking a nuclear World War III. Saying "If Khrushchev wants to rub my nose in the dirt, it's all over" and "we must not look to the world as if we were backing down," Kennedy fully expected war. When his staff told him there were diplomatic means which could be used to remove the missiles, he replied, "The object is not to stop offensive weapons, because the offensive weapons are already there, as much as it is to have a showdown with the Russians of one kind or another." Since Kennedy had already publicly declared the U.S. was "prepared to use nuclear weapons at the start" of any war, Kennedy's embargo and invasion would mean nuclear war if the Russians didn't accept the humiliation and back down, "one hell of a gamble," as Kennedy put it. Luckily for mankind, Khrushchev backed down, was removed from office because of the humiliation and America was rescued from its self-inflicted humiliations. For his role in hiding the real cause of the near-apocalyptic actions, President Kennedy remains universally seen as one of America's greatest Presidents...because he "kept his head" during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

We know that as a boy Adolf Hitler was tormented, humiliated and mocked by his father, without the slightest protection from his mother. We also know that he denied his true feelings toward his father. The real sources of his hatred thus become obvious. I had gone in search of the true motives not only for Hitler's mental make--up but also that of many other dictators. In all of them I identified the effects of hatred of a parent that remained unconscious not only because hating one's father was strictly prohibited but also because it was in the interests of the child's self--preservation to maintain the illusion of having a good father. Only in the form of a deflection onto others was hatred permitted, and then it could flow freely. For Adolf Hitler's father, the suspicion that he might be of Jewish descent was insufferable in the context of the anti--Jewish environment he grew up in. All the plaudits he earned himself as a customs officer were insufficient to liberate him from the latent rage at the disgrace and humiliation visited on him through no fault of his own. The only thing he could do with impunity was to take out this rage on his son Adolf. According to the reports of his daughter of his former marriage, Angela, he beat his son mercilessly every day. In an attempt to exorcise his childhood fears, his son nurtured the maniac delusion that it was up to him to free not only himself of Jewish blood but also all Germany and later the whole world. Right up to his death in the bunker, Hitler remained a victim of this delusion because all his life his fear of his half--Jewish father had remained locked in his unconscious mind. I can certainly picture the boy Hitler swearing vengeance on "the Jews," those monstrous fantasy--figures of an already diseased imagination. Consciously, he probably thought he could have led a happy life if "the Jew" had not plunged his grandmother into the disgrace that he and his family had to live with. And it was this that in his eyes served to excuse the batterings he received from his father, who after all was himself a victim of the evil and omnipotent Jew. In the mind of an angry, seriously confused child, it is only a short step from there to the idea that all Jews should be exterminated. In the household of Hitler's family lived for years the very unpredictable schizophrenic aunt Johanna whose behavior is reported to be very frightening to the child. As an adult, Hitler ordered to kill every handicapped and psychotic person to free Germany society from this burden. Germany seemed for him to symbolize the innocent child who had to be saved. Consequently, Hitler wanted to protect his nation from the dangers he himself had had to face. Absurd? Not at all. For an unconscious mind, this kind of symbolization might sound very normal and logical. Hitler's childhood had been so abusive-his father regularly beat him "with a hippopotamus whip," once enduring 230 blows of his father's cane and another time nearly killed by his father's whipping that he was full of rage toward the world. When he grew up, his sexual feelings were so mixed up with his revenge fantasies that he believed his sperm was poisonous and might enter the woman's bloodstream during sexual intercourse and poison her.

Mao Tse-Tung had been regularly whipped by his father and later sent 30 million people to their deaths, but he hardly ever admitted the full extent of the rage he must have felt toward his own father, a very severe teacher who had tried through beatings to "make a man" out of his son.

Joseph Stalin caused millions to suffer and die because even at the height of his power his actions were determined by unconscious infantile fear of powerlessness. Apparently his father, a poor cobbler from Georgia, attempted to drown his frustration with liquor and whipped his son almost every day. His mother displayed psychotic traits, was completely incapable of defending her son and was usually away from home either praying in church or running the priest's household. Stalin idealized his parents right up to the end of his life and was constantly haunted by the fear of dangers that had long since ceased to exist but were still present in his deranged mind. The same might be true of many other tyrants. The groups of people they singled out for persecution and the rationalization mechanisms they employed were different in each case, but the fundamental reason behind it was probably identical. They often drew on ideologies to disguise the truth and their own paranoia. And the masses chimed in enthusiastically because they were unaware of the real motives, including those operative in their own biographies. The infantile revenge fantasies of individuals would be of no account if society did not regularly show such naive alacrity in helping to make them come true.

Even though Ronald Reagan always tried to avoid talking about his father to interviewers-one biographer said that when asked about his family life he would "talk nonstop about his mother" but never mention his father -he relates in the autobiography how as a child he would be "pretending sleep" during his father's "week-long benders," and how he would "fill myself with grief for my father" when he found him "spread out as if he were crucified" on the front porch. The father, a violent Irishman, who was later described by his son as having lived a life of "almost permanent anger and frustration," used to kick young Ronald "with his boot" and often "clobbered" him and his brother. His overwhelming fear of his father made young Ronald a "good" boy, a "loner," who was "afraid of the dark," someone who suffered since childhood from various phobias, or irrational fears of various kinds. The first phobia he mentions in his autobiography is his fear "to the point of hysteria" of being piled upon by "the mass of writhing, shouting bodies" in a football game. Although he always loved the physical violence of football-enjoying the "clean hatred. . . where two men can literally fling themselves bodily at one another in combat"-he said he always panicked when he felt trapped by the pileup. His claustrophobia, his fear of being trapped in an enclosed space, was a "lifelong" problem, he told one biographer. Most of the time it indicated fears of physical closeness, usually with men, as when he had a "claustrophobia problem" when filming a movie in a submarine in close quarters with other male actors. By 1947, Reagan's despair about his life reached its climax. He began carrying a loaded pistol-ostensibly, he said, as protection against mutilation threats, but also as a return to his earlier having owned guns as a child and in his twenties. He let his physical condition run down so badly he came down with pneumonia, went to the hospital and became aware that he wanted to die. His guilt at outliving his father, his conviction that his wishes had actually killed him, had grown to such a point that only the ultimate punishment, his own death, would suffice. At that moment on the hospital bed, he was thrown back to his childhood, when he sometimes used to feel so depressed that he wished for death, once writing a poem extolling death as a salvation from "life's dreary dirge." If a devoted nurse had not coaxed him to continue breathing, he said, he would have quit living then and there. As for many Americans, anti-communism was for Reagan a perfect solution for his parricidal wishes. It solved the problem of his guilt for his father's death by putting his disturbing wishes into the communists. Without being consciously aware of why, he found that his new anti-communist activities made him feel better, saying to himself, in effect, "It's not me who wants to kill daddy. It's the commies who want to destroy all authority. And if I fight them, I'll be able to control my own wishes in them." Ronald Reagan's childhood was more like that of most presidents: a nightmare of neglect and abuse, in his case dominated by an obsessively religious mother and a violent, alcoholic father who, he said, used to "kick him with his boot" and "clobber" him and his brother. The result, as I have documented in my book, Reagan's America, was a childhood of phobias and fears "to the point of hysteria," buried feelings of rage and severe castration anxieties (the title of his autobiography was Where Is The Rest of Me?). As an adult, Reagan took to carrying a loaded pistol, and once considered suicide, only to be saved by the defensive maneuver of taking up politics and becoming an anti-communist warrior, crusading against imaginary "enemies" who were blamed for the feelings he denied in himself.

George Bush's childhood, (This refers to the ex-president, George Bush Sr.) was also full of fear and punishments. Psychohistorian Suzy Kane, interviewing George's brother, Prescott, Jr., discovered that Bush's father often beat him on the buttocks with a belt or a razor strap, the anticipation of which, Prescott, Jr. recalled, made them "quiver" with fear. "He took us over his knee and whopped us with his belt," Prescott said. "He had a strong arm, and boy, did we feel it." As he admitted to Kane, "We were all scared of him. We were scared to death of Dad when we were younger." Childhood classmates of George described his father as "aloof and distant...formidable and stern...very austere and not a warm person." "Dad was really scary," George himself once admitted. As a result, a desperate need to please was George's main trait as a child, and a depressive personality with an overwhelming need to placate became his trademarks as president. President Bush soon began to sense that he was being sent unconscious messages that a new war had to be found soon. His masculinity began to be questioned. He began to be pictured by cartoonists wearing a dress and was referred to more often as a "wimp." Cartoons began showing him being attacked and devoured by monsters. He sensed the nation's distress and rage, and decided he had better act soon. In such a peaceful post-Cold War world, where could he find an enemy crazy enough to be willing to fight the most powerful military force on earth, yet small enough for us to defeat easily? Since it is the task of a leader to provide enemies when required, Bush was not about to be caught short when his nation asked him to find an enemy. The arming of Iraq was a 15-year love affair for America. Saddam Hussein was our creation, our monster. We built him up and then tried to take him down. Elements of these childhood traumas can be seen in the Gulf War. Since George Bush had been beaten on his posterior during childhood, he threatened to "kick the ass" of Saddam Hussein. Many Americans, who had also had their posteriors beaten during childhood, multiplied the image: "Kick Ass" T-shirts, flags and belt buckles flooded the country; Americans told reporters they wanted to "whip that guy's butt" and "get him with his britches down"; and cartoons showed the U.N. building decorated with the words "KICK BUTT."

Saddam Hussein, like so many dictators, had an unbelievably traumatic childhood. His mother tried to abort him by hitting her abdomen with her fists and cutting herself with a kitchen knife, yelling, "In my belly I'm carrying a Satan!" She gave the infant Saddam away to his uncle, a violent man who beat the boy regularly, calling him "a son of a cur" and training him to use a gun and steal sheep. Saddam committed his first homicide at eleven. His political career centered on the murder of his fellow countrymen, and he particularly enjoyed watching the torture and execution of officers who had fought with him. Saddam would obviously make an ideal enemy to whom America could delegate the task of starting a new war so that we could remain guiltless. Saddam Hussein, for his part, saw the coming war in terms of the typical childhood traumas he and his countrymen had experienced. For instance, most male Iraqis endured a bloody, terrifying circumcision around the age of six, and Saddam used metaphors that reflected fears of bloody castration, saying that it was Iraq's mission to "return the branch, Kuwait, to the root, Iraq" and vowing Americans would be made to "swim in their own blood." It was his mission, he said, to return to Iraq "the part that was cut off by English scissors."

Please note that a few words and punctuation marks from the above quotes have been slightly modified by me, in order to provide proper grammatical and sentence structure flow, but none of the meaning or message of any quote has been affected by these tiny word modifications. Once again, my extreme thanks go out to the journalists, historical researchers, and writers who have managed to uncover the above facts of abuse concerning the supreme leaders mentioned, which I am sure represent only the tip of the iceberg insofar as the additional tortures that each of these leaders, as well as virtually all other supreme leaders of societies throughout the history of the human race, have endured. The above quotes come from essays that can be accessed at the following URL's:

The Clinton Scandals and the Yugoslav War as Purity Crusades
The Political Consequences of Child Abuse
The Making of a Fearful Leader
The Gulf War as a Mental Disorder
Restaging Early Traumas in War and Social Violence
War as Righteous Rape and Purification

I want to make it clear that while I am extremely impressed with many of the theories, ideas, and insights of Truth that are expressed and revealed in the essays at the above URL's, and I absolutely agree with and share some of the conclusions and insights that are reached, nobody should assume that I agree with or find accurate any specific conclusion or theory that is found within these essays. These essays were not written by me, and although I find them valuable and agree with parts of the ideology expressed in these essays, I also totally disagree with and reject other portions of the theories and ideologies. Therefore none of you have any right to assume that I agree with the ideology expressed in any part of these essays, nor should you assume that any of these essays represent Forbidden Truth. Only the essays contained at this original website, that I am authoring, represent Forbidden Truth.

The quotes above are fairly lengthy, but I feel they are extremely valuable for any seeker of Truth. We see above that the supreme leaders of societies, throughout history and today as well, especially those who are most eager to participate in mutually agreeable war, were and are victims of extreme childhood trauma, torture, and brutal victimization. They are mentally ill, justifiably enraged, tortured victim-creations of their societies, and they chose to undertake wars for the primary purpose of alleviating their own personal, internal, emotional rage, hate, terror, and distress. They used the members of their societies as weapons, living, breathing, human weapons, to commit genocide and mass murder on their behalf. Understanding this Truth, it is up to you, as Superior individuals, to condemn your societal leaders, to refuse to accept their leadership over you, to refuse to serve as sacrificial lambs for their mental derangements. The problem is, you diseased creatures share the same torturous childhoods, the same mental derangements, the same total lack of ability to recognize and understand your own internal motivations and perverse impulses of self-sacrifice and self-destruction, that rule the True Realities of your genocidal supreme leaders. The only "solution" to this problem, is the embrace of Truth. Since there is no chance that any significant number of you diseased creatures will find the inspiration or ability to embrace Truth, you will continue, just as you have done over the past few years, to choose to empower homicidally deranged individuals to be your supreme leaders, and they in turn, will continue to commit genocide for both their own personal cathartic pleasure/relief, and to appease your suppressed homicidal rage and hate, that you are desperate, on a daily basis, to find a societally sanctioned release for.

In the above quotes, we learn, beyond all doubt, that Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., Mao Tse-Tung Saddam Hussein, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler, all supreme leaders of societies, were all brutally tortured and victimized when they were children. As supreme leaders, they all chose to provoke and participate in genocidal wars, and they did so for both personally cathartic, and politically beneficial reasons. Regardless of whether you accept all of the psychological theories that are contained within the six Psychohistory essays that can be accessed via the above URL's, it is undeniable, to any sane thinker, that all human beings reflect their True Reality, in their adult life choices and life paths, and that this True Reality is based primarily upon the sum total of their personal life experiences, most especially their childhood experiences. Drawing upon the Truths of war that I have already revealed above, those of us who can think sanely and in a Superior manner, see that each of these leaders was absolutely mentally ill, as well as overtly malevolent, in terms of the political policies and agendas of deliberate genocide that they chose to pursue and undertake, during the time that they held their supreme leadership positions. As an example, lets look at the leader who is probably considered the "best", the most benevolent, of all that are listed above, John F. Kennedy. This man was mentally ill and homicidally enraged. He viewed the presidency as nothing more than a platform from which he could claim violent vengeance for the abuses and victimization that he experienced as a child, and the life frustrations and emotional obsessions he was experiencing as an adult. This man, John F. Kennedy, chose to try to provoke and initiate war, with both cuba and russia. His actions were completely irrational and genocidally evil. Because of his mental illness, he perceived the leaders of cuba and russia to be bullies who posed a threat to his manhood, as an individual. He cared not an iota about his citizen-slaves, he gave their safety, welfare, best interests, and lives, not an iota of rational concern or attention, in his actions, in his attempts to provoke a genocidal war. He repeatedly taunted and dared the supreme leaders of these two societies, desperately trying to get them to declare war upon america, so that he could have the pretense of "moral justification", to indulge in an orgy of bloodletting, using american children, so-called "soldiers", as his weapons. This mentally ill supreme leader deliberately provoked two other supreme leaders, for no valid reason, absolutely increasing, to a huge degree, the possibility that every single american citizen-slave would be murdered via a nuclear holocaust, as a direct result of his own personal, irrational, insane, overtly malicious and provocative actions as the president of the united states of america. This man overtly tried to murder Fidel Castro, the supreme leader of a tiny and essentially helpless nation, this man deliberately undertook actions and policies, as president, which greatly increased the likelihood of every single american citizen being killed via a nuclear holocaust, and yet he is considered to be one of america's most beloved and "best" presidents. This insane man came closer than any other supreme leader in the history of the world has come, to personally initiating a nuclear war that would have killed hundreds of millions of people at a bare minimum, and possibly would have extincted the entire human race, by deliberately provoking, humiliating, taunting, and bullying the supreme leader of the soviet union, for no valid reason of any kind. Only because the soviet union supreme leader, as an individual, was Superior and sane enough to be willing to accept the bullying and humiliation, most likely recognizing that he was dealing with a mentally deranged John F. Kennedy, were hundreds of millions of lives saved, and possibly the human race itself, saved from extinction. How utterly perverse it is that the american populace knows, and the historical record reveals, absolutely no trace of this remarkable Truth, and instead John F. Kennedy is perceived within the popular culture as being a good man, a good president, a sane and superior Supreme Leader. And on top of everything else, Nikita Khrushchev, the then supreme leader of russua, who literally "saved the world", or at least saved hundreds of millions of human lives, by refusing to allow John F. Kennedy to provoke and goad him into agreeing to engage in a war, was thrown out of power by the pathetically inferior, bloodthirsty citizen-slaves of his society, for daring to have refused to satiate their homicidal bloodlust, via a war, as they wanted him to do. Any supreme leader of a diseased society who refuses to provide wars, to his homicidally enraged citizens, faces the likelihood of both losing his own job of supreme leader, and having his country plunge into internal strife, increased crime, civil war, as his diseased and deranged citizens demand and seek out some type of outlet for their suppressed homicidal rage.

I'm not going to offer additional detailed commentary on all the other supreme leaders listed above, since the facts of their victimization, and the reality of how they chose to initiate and engage in genocidal wars, speak for themselves. It is utterly outrageous that such mentally ill torture victims are empowered by you citizen-slaves, to serve as your supreme leaders. But is it surprising? No! Because the vast majority of you citizens have endured just as much brutality, victimization, injustice, and you deliberately seek out a supreme leader who shares the same mindset of suppressed but very real homicidal rage, that you feel at your True Reality emotional cores. I now want to expand and deepen some of the primary Forbidden Truths that I have already revealed, and branch them out further. One very interesting issue to explore, is how societal leaders are oftentimes absolutely determined to both provoke and sustain a war. In the John F. Kennedy example detailed above, we see the absolute determination of John, to provoke a war with cuba and russia. Even when told that the "dispute" could likely be settled via diplomatic means, negotiation, compromise, etc..., your homicidally enraged president declared: "The object is not to stop offensive weapons, because the offensive weapons are already there, as much as it is to have a showdown with the Russians of one kind or another." He is saying, in deceitful language of course, since all supreme leaders are professional liars, "I want a war. I want a war at all costs. Nothing and nobody will stop me from having the war that I want." This is an extremely common theme within all wars, an absolute determination by at least one of the supreme leaders, to both provoke and maintain a war. An excellent example of this is occurring right now, in the year 2001. The president of the united states, George Bush, is homicidally enraged, he senses that his citizen-slaves are homicidally enraged as well, and he is therefore determined to engage in a lengthy, extremely deadly war against afghanistan. Every public statement that he has made, is designed to make it impossible for the supreme leaders of afghanistan to avoid being genocidally mass murdered. Incredibly, he is refusing to negotiate with the afghani supreme leaders, even though it is clear to any rational observer that the supreme leaders of afghanistan are in fact eager to negotiate and eager to cut short this war! George Bush is the warmonger here, the Taliban supreme leaders have in fact tried, at every turn, to head off this war, while still maintaining a shred of dignity and respect for themselves, as well as to naturally retain their power and positions of being supreme leaders. George Bush has deliberately made it impossible for the Taliban to choose a peaceful way out, because he is determined to satiate his own homicidal rage, as well as the homicidal rage of american citizen-slaves, for both personal and political gain and benefit.

Why does George Bush refuse to negotiate with the Taliban? Why does he refuse to provide them with the evidence they ask for? Why does he mock and reject all suggestions by the Taliban that through negotiation, they might be willing to put Osama bin-Laden on trial themselves, or hand him over to an international court, or possibly even hand him over to the american judicial system, if enough evidence of his guilt is produced and presented?? Why does he deliberately humiliate and insult the supreme leaders of Afghanistan on a daily basis? It is because George Bush is determined to commit genocide, he is determined to satiate your homicidal rage, if you happen to be an american citizen. He is determined to steer clear and avoid like the plague, any peaceful solution to the situation. He is deliberately provoking, humiliating, bullying the supreme leaders of afghanistan in a merciless manner, in order to make certain that no peaceful resolution can possibly occur, while at the same time mercilessly blaming and demonizing the Taliban so as to retain a maximum illusion of moral justification, as he undertakes his genocidal attacks. How can any sane thinker accept George Bush's official, undeniable decree that he is "unwilling to negotiate for peace" with the supreme leaders of the society that he has declared war upon, without recognizing that such a decree proves that George Bush is determined to maintain and to increase this war, resulting in genocidal death and murder? The Taliban are willing to negotiate for peace. America is not willing to negotiate. And yet 99.999999% of all american citizen-slaves insanely perceive america as holding the moral high ground, america as being the seeker of "peace", even as america continues to massacre essentially helpless and defenseless human beings, who pose no threat of any kind to americans, on american soil, as individuals. George Bush is terrified of the possibility that the Taliban might hand over to an international court, or put on trial within their own judicial system, Osama bin-Laden. This possibility absolutely terrifies him, because he realizes that it might remove some of the bloodlust fervor that is passionately gripping him and his citizen-slaves. It might reduce public support for the genocidal war that he has successfully promoted and legitimized to his brainwashed citizen-slaves. Therefore, he made a tactical decision to make it literally impossible for the Taliban to even criticize, much less hand over, Osama bin-Laden. He did this by refusing to negotiate with the Taliban, demonizing the Taliban at every turn, calling them evil criminals, proudly announcing that they will be overthrown by force in this war that he is launching upon them. This leaves the Taliban no choice but to embrace essentially their only somewhat powerful ally and supporter, Osama bin-Laden, thus setting the stage for yet another genocidal war initiated by america, the most evil and diseased society on planet earth.

We can use this same war to delve further into the issue of "the other side started it!" Lets look at the facts: On September 11, 2001, in the country of america, 19 individual human beings deliberately crashed four airplanes, in an attempt to kill as many human beings as they possibly could. There was absolutely no claim or declaration of "war", of any kind, made. A day or so later, the president of america publically declared, via the media, that "an act of war, war itself, has been declared upon us, upon america." But in reality nobody had made any such declaration! George Bush simply lied, because he wanted to declare war against Afghanistan. He was unwilling to declare war first, recognizing that this might slightly reduce the illusion of moral high ground that he and his insane society clings to, so he decided to make up a lie, to accuse someone else of declaring a war against america, so that he could more easily demonize them, and retain the illusion of america being a "victim who is only responding to the war that was declared against us, in declaring war back against the enemy." In point of fact, the Taliban, in other words the Afghanistan government, displayed an almost incredible degree of restraint in the wake of america declaring war against them, waiting until days after the actual war was launched by america, after hundreds of Afghani citizens had been killed by americans, before finally declaring war back, by publically announcing that they were embracing a "jihad", a holy war, against america. So, it is clear to any sane thinker that this war was officially declared and started by america.

This leaves us with the issue of who "provoked the conflict" between the two societies, that caused the war to occur. The issue of provocation, as I have already stated, is extremely difficult to accurately resolve, because diseased and evil societies/governments are constantly provoking, goading, humiliating, threatening, victimizing, each other. The notion that the afghanistan government provoked the conflict by providing safe harbor to the man who convinced these nineteen men to commit mass murder on american soil, is extremely thin and does not hold up to any type of rational scrutiny. Neither does the notion that the Afghanistan government is somehow responsible for the actions of these nineteen autonomous men, or for "helping" them to undertake the actions that they did, to the degree of justifying the initiation of a war by america, against the autonomous country of afghanistan and it's supreme leaders. Holding the government of Afghanistan responsible for the alleged criminal actions of one of it's citizens, while refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of the Afghan judicial system to determine the guilt or innocence of the alleged criminal, smacks of the highest degree of arrogance and scorn for the autonomy of other governments, that has been a hallmark of the american governmental policy of fascist oppression for centuries, ever since america came into existence as a nation, in fact.

The reality is, the four September 11, 2001 incidents on american soil were retaliatory strikes by a private individual who felt and believed that he himself, as well as the society that he chooses to "pledge allegiance" to, had been and continue to be brutally and unjustly victimized and genocidally harmed in a direct way, by the official, ongoing governmental actions and policies of america. This is the Truth. It doesn't mean that Osama's society is a good, decent, moral society. It doesn't even necessarily mean that Afghanistan is a more moral, more decent society/government than america is, although it is clear to me that a very good argument can be made that america is currently the most immoral, most diseased society/government on planet earth. The unbiased, factually accurate Truth is that as is usually the case, both societies that are involved in this war are inferior, diseased, genocidally harmful towards their own citizen-slaves, and neither government has a legitimate right to exist, a legitimate right to stay in power. Neither society deserves to have the support of it's citizens, much less to have millions of citizen-slaves willing and eager to risk their lives and to die while "defending" their society/government. Because conflict between diseased and evil nations is ritualistic and retaliatory in structure and design, the question of which side "provoked" the conflict that resulted in the actual initiation of a war, is quite irrelevant and cannot be accurately revealed. It would be easy to say that america provoked the conflict, that has led to this america-afghanistan war, and on a personal level, I am quite certain that america did provoke it. But it is not possible to examine, or even to know about, every single tit for tat retaliatory act of injustice and provocation that each society/government has undertaken against the other society/government. It's also not possible to accurately track down the very first act of unjust imposition/provocation that one of these societies/governments imposed upon the other. In theory, you could say that the very first act, hundreds of years ago, was the "initial provocation", but in practical terms, there have been so many provocations since then, that to blame the initial provocation, hundreds of years ago, for the current war, doesn't really hold up solidly. How can this issue be resolved? Very easily, because it is not a major or primary point of contention, and it does not deserve our focus, to any ongoing degree.

The profoundly important Truths that must be focused on is the fact that both societies are incredibly inferior, diseased, perverse, and genocidally evil towards their own citizens, to the degree that these societies cause even more harm to their own citizens, than they can or do seek to cause to members of "enemy" societies during the commission of wars. This brings us to the even more profound Truth, that no society/government deserves to have the allegiance of it's own citizens. Within a society of sane human beings, if the governments of america and afghanistan declared war upon one another, not only would no americans be willing to fight in the war on behalf of america, and not only would no afghanis be willing to fight in the war on behalf of afghanistan, but a majority of american citizens would in fact be more willing to fight against the american government, as it is currently structured and operated, than would be willing to fight for the american government, and this exact same rule would apply for afghani citizens. This would constitute Truth, an embrace of Truth, a recognition by individuals that currently, in the year 2001, all societies inflict the greatest degree of injustice, trauma, and harm, upon their own citizens, thus, such societies not only do not deserve the "patriotic" support of their citizen-slaves, but if in fact such societies seek to enlist their citizen-slaves to fight and go to war on behalf of their society, it is the decreed enemy society/government which is in most cases "more" worthy of the individual's support, than his own society/government is. On a practical level of course, since neither society is moral, decent, or good, the primary obligation of all self-loving, Truth-embracing individuals would be to refuse to endanger their own safety, health, welfare, and life, by refusing to fight for or aid either society's side, in any war.

One of the emotional/brainwash dynamics at play here, is the same dynamic that causes most children who are being brutally victimized and abused by their parents, to ferociously cling to their abusers, if confronted with the "threat" of being taken away from their parents and placed in foster homes or under the control of Child Protective Services. Most children in such a situation will fiercely demand to stay with their parent/torturers. They will resist all attempts by CPS and other social workers to rescue them, to remove them from custody of their parents, even though no other human being on planet earth has hurt, abused, victimized them as much as their parents have. Why is this so?? It's because the child-slaves have been terroristically brainwashed into believing that even though their parents have hurt them a great deal, far more than any other human being has hurt them, if they should fall into the clutches of other human beings, as primary slaves, the other human beings would hurt them far more than their parents had and are hurting them. The child has no real basis for comparison, all the child knows is that his primary caretakers have brutally hurt him, but they sometimes claim to like/love him, and they tell him, together with the lie-based societal ideology that all children are subjected to, that plenty of other adults are "evil" and will inflict far more abuse and terrible suffering upon him, than he is currently enduring. So the tortured child makes the choice to align himself with his torturing parents, to resist all efforts to place him in a safer environment with superior caretakers, because he has been brainwashed into believing that despite the fact that he is suffering greatly right now, under the custody of his torturing parents, he will suffer much greater abuse and trauma if placed in the primary care of any other adults. An instinctual "fear of the unknown" comes into significant play as well. This is one of the dynamics at work, in an exactly parallel manner, on the issue of citizen-slaves of a society/government choosing to declare fierce loyalty, devotion, and support for "their" society/government, during a declared war. The pathetic, brainwashed citizen-slaves are made terrified of the "bizarre" ideology of the demonized enemy, and they are told that the other, bizarre and demonized society/government is evil, that this "enemy" will torture, enslave, brutalize, destroy the citizen-slaves, if it is allowed to "win the war". This causes terror among the tortured citizen-slaves, and wins their blind allegiance and devotion, to the point where they are perfectly willing to risk their lives via an insane & irrational "defense" of their society, even though their own society has already and is continuing to, torture, enslave, brutalize, and overtly harm them, a Forbidden Truth that of course 99.999999 of all citizen-slaves can never even come close to understanding, much less accepting and embracing as Truth. And this is despite the fact that the "enemy" society has not directly harmed them at all, exactly parallel to how the child clings to his viciously abusive parents, refusing to go live with strangers who have never abused or hurt him at all. Fear of the unknown, causes you creatures to chooses a known evil, over a completely unknown option, due to both societal brainwashing and an irrational, illogical fear that the unknown option will end up being even more evil, and causing you even more harm, despite the fact that there is no valid reason to jump to that assumption. Absolutely pathetic, the complete lack of sane reasoning skills, among you humans.

The proper, sane solution/response to declarations of war by societal leaders, assuming that both leaders seek to engage in a war involving their human weapons, would be for the citizens of each society to seize their supreme leader, then to transport both leaders to an arena that is equipped with a large, locking, steel cage. Both supreme leaders would be stripped naked, shoved into the cage, the cage would be locked, and the two leaders would be instructed that they are to either fight to the death, or agree to call off their desired war. Both leaders must agree to call off the war, or else the fight to the death must be initiated. Does this sound "crazy" to you creatures? If it does, the reason is that you people are crazy, and cannot recognize a sane and proper solution when it is presented to you. In war, supreme leaders of societies use you, their citizen-slaves, as human weapons. They sacrifice your safety, your health, your lives, to satisfy and satiate their own insane and malevolent personal demons, as well as increase their own political popularity and strength. They have every right to live out their True Realities, to victimize and genocidally harm others, as does every human victim. The issue at hand is whether you, the citizens, have an obligation to choose to allow these supreme leaders to dictate, manipulate, control, and sacrifice your lives, for their personally cathartic pleasure and gain? From any sane perspective, the answer to this question is No. You have no such obligation, and if you possess a proper degree of self-love and narcissism, you will overtly reject all efforts by your supreme leaders to manipulate, control, and endanger your lives, even if you yourself are filled with rage and hate and share a similar mindset of needing to claim vengeance through violence, as your supreme leaders do. Societies and governments deliberately attempt to hijack, manipulate, control, and direct the homicidal rage of their citizen-slaves. They provide you with a "demonized enemy", instruct you that it is a good thing to try and kill these total strangers, and decree this form of murder to be not only legal, but morally appropriate and necessary. This is the Truth about what war is. The purpose of war is to provide societal leaders with an outlet for their genocidal, power-crazed rage, to increase their popular stranglehold of rule within the political dynamic of the society, and to provide the masses of citizen-slaves with a demonized foreign enemy to hate and to kill, so that the internal rage that exists within the populace is directed outward, towards an "innocent" foreign society that has been invalidly demonized, as opposed to allowing this rage to possibly be directed in a more appropriate manner by individuals, towards the society that is in fact directly responsible for the personal victimization of the individual, the society that the person was born into, grew up within, and/or currently lives within.

So, when a supreme leader attempts to promote a war, to incite, coerce, and recruit his citizen-slaves to participate in a war, the proper, sane response by citizens would be to demand that the leader himself agree to be locked in a cage with the opposing supreme leader, the leader that he is trying to provoke into agreeing to engage in a war. Lock them both in the steel cage, have them fight to the death if they so wish. If they are so desperately eager to cathartically relieve their personal life traumas and rage, let them put their lives on the line. They do not deserve to be able to put your lives on the line, to get you to fight as weapons on their behalf, using nothing but lies, brainwashing, manipulation, and a perversely invalid doctrine of patriotic illusion and enemy demonization. Of course the problem, as usual, is that you humans are incredibly inferior. You buy into the brainwashing and lies at the drop of a hat, you follow each other and tow the party lines of your societies like lemmings. You are filled with homicidal rage, coupled with the perverse notion that you have morals, and thus you are on a daily, desperate search for any living things, human and otherwise, that you can justify demonizing and directing your homicidal hatred upon. At the same time, you look to your supreme leaders to provide you with the "moral permission" that you feel you need, in order to maintain the illusion that you are good creatures even as you release your homicidal rage. This is the absolutely perfect climate for enraged, homicidal societal leaders to match up, incite each other, mutually demonize each other's regimes and citizen-slaves, and engage in genocidal wars, which serve to relieve their own personal emotional distress, and increase the popularity of both their governments, in most cases, even as the human weapons of each society are insanely attempting to mass murder the total strangers who just happen to be members of the other society, upon the insane command of the supreme leaders of each society. It is utterly mind-boggling, how you creatures seem to have not an iota of interest in even understanding, the incredible, multi-tiered layers of brutal vitimization that your own societal leaders deliberately and maliciously impose upon you, via the war ritual.

If confronted with a demand to fight to the death inside of a steel cage, the vast majority of supreme leaders would decline. They would call off the war, and try to find other ways to relieve their personal, emotional distress and homicidal rage. Being a supreme leader offers many different methods to boost the ego, oppress and victimize other human beings, both within and outside of your own nation, without having to outright risk your own life, in a direct, fight to the death manner. Supreme leaders engage in wars because it is a relatively easy, relatively safe way, for them to both increase the popularity/strength of their regimes, and to make themselves feel very good emotionally, to relieve their personal frustrations, rage, and hate, by employing a vast number of human beings as weapons to commit mass murder and other atrocities against fellow humans. They themselves often do not feel that they are seriously endangering their own lives or safety, in the wars they choose to engage in. If stripped of the ability to use and hide behind their brainwashed human weapons, and compelled to personally fight each other to the death in a two man battle, most would recognize the serious danger to their own personal safety and lives, and simply call off the war. Would this earn them a justifiable label of "coward"? No, not really. Sane human beings instinctually seek to defend and protect themselves, and if faced with a threat or danger, they want to use weapons, the most effective weapons they can, to try and protect themselves and maximize their chances of not being hurt or killed. So, just like a mugger, hijacker, cop, security guard, or aspiring murderer usually wants to have an effective weapon to use to both protect himself and to defeat any threat or danger they may face, the supreme leaders of societies want to have the only genuinely effective weapon that can be used to engage in a war, that would be a huge number of human beings, human weapons, so-called "soldiers", who have officially agreed to fight, risk death, and try to kill complete strangers, blindly upon the command of the supreme leader. If this "army" is not available, not willing to serve as human weapons, the supreme leader will most likely call off the war, since he personally is not willing to risk his own life, in a locked steel cage, one on one battle to the death type of event. The key to understanding how genocidally evil societies are, is recognizing that knives, guns, bombs, and human beings, can all be used as weapons. But guns, knives, bombs are not alive, they are not sentient. They cannot suffer horrific consequences, because they have no sentient existence. Human beings however, are alive, they can and do suffer horribly. And with limitless malice aforethought, societies and governments choose to genocidally turn human beings into human weapons, displaying the same utter contempt for their lives and welfare that characterizes every aspect of the slave-based design structure of all human societies.

Let us keep in mind here, that a very large percentage of human beings are in fact genuinely suicidal, either on a conscious or subconscious level. The more mentally diseased and dysfunctional a person is, the more likely they are to have a suicidal ideology within their mindsets. And supreme leaders of societies are among the most mentally diseased and dysfunctional of all human beings. Therefore, logic dictates that at least some supreme leaders of societies have been and will be actively suicidal, even as they serve as supreme leaders. An argument can be made that John F. Kennedy's chosen policies and interactions with russia while he was president, indicates suicidal ideology on his part. An even better argument can be made that right now, Osama bin-Laden's chosen actions over the past year or so, indicates that he is actively suicidal, although most likely not on a conscious level. I will be discussing suicide at great length in a separate essay later on at this website, but the specific point that needs to be made here, is that the suicidal supreme leader poses the greatest of all threats and danger to the citizen-slaves that he rules, because such a supreme leader is most likely to deliberately choose to undertake not only genocidal wars, but in addition, genocidal wars that his military is very unlikely to be able to "win", thus maximizing the likely number of casualties that his own brainwashed human weapons, as well as all citizens living under his regime, will likely suffer. The greatest hope and likelihood for the extinction of humanity from this planet, lies in a supreme leader of a society/government, filled with both homicidal rage and suicidal derangement, having access to enough weapons that are capable of destroying all human life on planet earth, and having the emotional strength and determination to not only goad another supreme leader into participating in a war, but escalating the war to the point where he can emotionally justify to himself, using the nuclear and other weapons to the point of worldwide human annihilation. I am quite confident that this will occur, in the near future, especially since the societies/governments that are most diseased and evil, such as america, are generally the same societies that have developed and stockpiled the largest supplies of the most lethal weapons, that are easily capable of annihilating all human life from the planet. The only ingredient needed, is to have two supreme leaders, both extremely enraged and mentally ill, of two such societies, come together and decide to help each other feel better by engaging in a war.

When this does occur, and I say when because it will definitely occur, just a matter of time, it is not the two supreme leaders who should be "blamed" for the annihilation of the human race that will occur. No, folks. It is you, I repeat it is you people, you "ordinary" citizen-slaves, who will be to blame. You Truth-haters who will only empower people who are as enraged and insane as you are, to be your supreme leaders. You people who are so desperate to find a legal and morally sanctioned outlet for your homicidal rage, that you agree to serve, act, and perform as human weapons for your supreme leaders, by joining the militaries of your societies and accepting the "opportunity" to "serve your country" by blindly mass murdering complete strangers upon the command of the leader of your society, a society that has already abused, victimized, enslaved, and viciously harmed you. Even though you will be to "blame", we must continue to recognize that in all aspects of life, the victim must not be demonized or held responsible, or declared "guilty" of anything. All human weapons, all "soldiers", are victims of the society that they are "defending", the society that they are citizens of, and of the genocidal war their supreme leader chose to undertake. My use of the word "blame" above, is not meant to place responsibility upon the mainstream citizen-slaves. It is only meant to reveal the Truth, that you creatures are the "last line in the sand", if only you were sane and Superior, no diseased & deranged aspiring societal leader could ever come to power. But this Truth is a moot, basically irrelevant Truth, because the reality is that you creatures are insane and inferior, created torture victims of each previous generation of tortured, insane, and inferior human beings, and this endless, unbreakable cycle is guaranteed to continue, right up until the very moment of species annihilation. On a personal level, it does comfort and please me to know with certainty that the human race will extinct itself fairly soon, because I recognize that the human species, not only because of the personal torture that it has maliciously subjected me to, but for all of the reasons outlined in this Manifesto, does not deserve to exist.

Okay, we still have a lot of ground to cover on this war topic, so I will try to be a bit less verbose as the mountain of Forbidden Truth continues to grow and deepen. Some things need to be said about the role that the media plays in all wars. First of all, there is no such thing as a "free" media, in either a democratic or a totalitarian/communist society. All medias are viciously manipulated and controlled by the supreme political/ideological leaders of societies. Democratic societies simply provide a more lie-based illusion of media freedom, to their citizen-slaves. This is nothing more than an illusion, and during the period of time that a society declares itself to be "at war", the illusion is revealed, especially within societies that claim to be free and democratic, to any sane observer and Truth-seeker. During wartime, the government overtly removes even the illusions of media freedom. The government even admits that it lies to the media, but claims to be justified in doing so because it's necessary in order to "protect the national interests". Speaking of the 1988 Persian Gulf war, Jay Coupe, who was at that time the official spokesman for the united states Joint Chiefs of Staff, now admits: We actually put out a false message to mislead people. The idea was not to give information about the movement of our carrier. We were trying to confuse people. A united states military officer who is "currently" involved in planning out the current war that is underway between america and afghanistan told the Washington Post newspaper, in September of 2001, We're going to lie about things. If it is an information war, certainly the bad guys will lie. Ha, "bad guys", that makes me chuckle, the promoters of war, along with you ordinary, brainwashed idiot folks, never pass up a chance to demonize the enemy. :-) But I digress, the point here is that the societal lie about the media being free, is finally unveiled when it comes to war. The government admits that it is lying to the media, and the media admits, although usually not in an overtly verbal manner, that it is not actively pursuing or demanding Truth, although it still maintains the lie that it tries to avoid reporting things that it positively knows to be false, as being definitively true. The reality is that all medias are constantly being used as tools, promotional and ideological tools, by societal leaders, and the lies, myths, brainwashings that are a core fabric of the societal structure and design itself, along with many other more topical, evolving lies and deceptions, are constantly being put forth by the media as constituting Truth, every single day of your lives. Neither the government nor the media will admit to this fact, of course. But during wartime, after patriotic fervor has been whipped up, the veil of deceit is momentarily allowed to drop, using a claim that "We must keep some things secret, and lie about other things, in order to protect our national security". What right does the media have to align itself with the existing government within which they live as empowered citizen-slaves? The media has absolutely no business promoting the war that "their" societal leaders have chosen to engage in. And yet that's exactly what they do, they adopt the exact same insanely patriotic attitude in their journalistic endeavors, as all citizen-slaves are instructed to adopt during wartime, by their malevolent supreme leaders. Journalist, news journalists, deliberately lie and withhold information from you, the citizen-slaves. They also overtly take the side of the government that they live as citizen-slaves of, the government that holds fascist power over them. This is every bit as true in the american journalism system, as in any other government's. Every mainstream, nationally broadcast news show in america, that originates in america, takes an overtly nationalistic tone and position, in reporting about any war that america is actively engaged in. This demonstrates that there is no genuine freedom of the press/media, and it also demonstrates that all "empowered" news media outlets in america, are in fact compelled by force, to serve as propaganda agents for the american government, in it's war promotion and legitimization efforts and intentions. This Truth applies to all other medias in all other countries too of course, as regards their war engagements.

Now, the fact that almost all so-called "journalists" are eager and proud to assume this nationalistic bias in their reporting, is a testament to how incredibly pervasive and powerful societal brainwashing and "non-forceful" coercion, within a society like america. But make no mistake, in a capitalistic society, journalists are nothing more than employee-slaves.. It is the highly wealthy owners of national media companies who are under the terroristic control of societal leaders, and it is they who dictate, by force, meaning among other things the power to fire any employee of theirs at any time, for any reason, the nationalistic tone that all news reporters are required to take. On top of all that, the patriotic brainwashing of the citizenry is so pervasive that any mainstream news source that refused to take a pro-america bias in it's reporting, would not only come under intense public criticism, but also lose so many viewers/readers/listeners that it would become economically unviable. So, in a very real sense, the capitalistic system itself serves to silence, chill, and shut off media freedom, because every media outlet is economically dependent upon pandering to the brainwashed majority, thus losing all ability to focus on reporting the true, unbiased, facts. All wars are nothing more than endless propaganda campaigns, lie after lie after lie, denial of truth by the government, suppression of information, deliberate misdirection of public focus and denial of the actual, ongoing events related to the war, not to mention the True reasons for why the war was even undertaken by the leaders of the society. The media is at the very heart of how wars are promoted and propagandized, on a daily basis. The media shamelessly and at every turn validates and legitimizes these governmental propaganda campaigns, deliberately feeding citizen-slaves a completely invalid, distorted, untrue, biased, perversely patriotic and pro-government ideological message, on a daily basis, thus virtually guaranteeing that no significant number of citizen-slaves will ever be able to wade through this mountain of lie-based governmental propaganda, and arrive at rational, sane, Truth, such as I am revealing in this essay.

Within a free and sane society, the media would have absolutely no bias towards any government. The news media would recognize and accept that it has a sacred obligation to report and disseminate the factual truths of all stories, while not even conveying, much less promoting, any type of ideological, political, moralistic, or nationalistic bias. There is absolutely no valid reason for why the american news media reports the america/afghanistan war in a certain tone, while the afghani media, small as it is, reports this war in a completely different tone. The fact that the two tones are completely different, proves that each news media is choosing, admittedly under the terroristic coercion of their government, to serve not the public interest, not the interests of humanity, not the journalistic code of ethics via truthful and unbiased reporting that most claim to subscribe to, but rather the undeniably lie-based, propaganda structured, completely malevolent, nationalistically genocidal agenda of the governments in which they reside and serve as citizens to, and the mentally deranged supreme leaders who rule these governments. The news media is an active and willing partner of the government, in all wars. The media participates as an ally of the government in which it is based and headquartered, reporting on the war from a horrifically biased, journalistically invalid, perspective. The news media overtly serves as a valuable tool for disseminating governmental lies and propaganda at all times, but most outrageously and harmfully, during wartime. There is an absolutely collusive agreement between governments and the empowered news medias that exist within governments, to promote via propaganda and lies, legitimize, and foment public support for the government that is in place, and all governmental policies, with absolutely no journalistically valid interest in uncovering or revealing Truth, during all wars. And this is true for all governments of the world, possibly even more true for so-called democracies, because the illusion of such societies offering "more freedom" has to be maintained, but at the same time overcome, via an even greater degree of relentless propaganda and media misdirection designed to terroristically compel as many citizen-slaves as possible into agreeing to fervently support "their" government and society during wartime.

A few words about patriotism here. Patriotism is an artificial mindset, induced by coercive governmental ideology, in which citizen-slaves of a society are told that they need to develop an irrational devotion and allegiance to their government, which is based upon blind acceptance of governmental claims and demands, that very specifically involve no philosophical or intellectual efforts to recognize Truth. Within the teachings that societies undertake, in getting citizens to adopt a patriotic mindset, a very specific pattern of blind, irrational allegiance, that instructs pupils to reject and ignore rationality and Truth, is employed. This pattern is similar to how societies addict their citizens to the insane god myth. All rational thinking and deductive reasoning is declared invalid and improper, as a part of patriotic brainwashing. Irrational, nonsensical, blindly hypocritical mindsets are decreed to be proper and appropriate, as the plague of patriotic ideology is imposed upon citizens. Overtly terroristic, as well as milder types of peer pressure coercion, are employed in these efforts. As always, the pathetic human need to be considered "normal" by other people who are nearby, coworkers, relatives, etc..., is exploited by society, as the patriotic fervor is desperately spread, especially during a decreed "time of war". It is no exaggeration to call patriotism a plague. Yes, it likely is less toxic, on some levels, than the god myth plague and some other plagues, but it is still a toxic plague, and it is highly destructive to a tremendous number of human beings, not only destroying their ability to even try to recognize the Forbidden Truths of war, but in many cases directly causing them to needlessly and insanely endanger and sacrifice their own safety, health, and lives.

I've already made this point, but it is so provocative that it bears a bit of repetition and enhancement: In war, supreme leaders of societies use their citizen-slaves as surrogates, to commit murder of complete strangers on their behalf. The soldier is being used as a surrogate murderer, by the homicidally enraged and mentally ill supreme leader of his society. This type of murder is decreed to be legal, of course, and it is undeniably true that a significant number of children who join militaries, do so very specifically because they themselves are homicidally enraged and recognize that in joining the military, they may, they certainly hope they will, be given an opportunity to commit murder, to kill fellow human beings, without facing any type of negative or punitive consequences/punishment. There is a tremendous, albeit a perverse, advantage to society in convincing these children, these torture victims, these homicidally enraged victims of the society that they were born into and raised up within, to align themselves not against the evil society that is responsible for their victimization, but rather for this society. To direct their homicidal rage on behalf of the society that is guilty of their victimization, when all logic dictates that if they are to direct homicidal rage towards anyone, it would be much more appropriately and rationally directed towards their own society, not towards a demonized enemy society that in most cases has literally had no negative impact of any kind upon their personal life and the life traumas that the person has endured. It is tragic that so many children make this choice, lacking the intellectual ability or the emotional/psychological strength/insight that is required, to recognize that there is a very real and genuine difference between directing homicidal rage upon others within the society that created/victimized you, as opposed to directing such rage upon members of a foreign society, only when given "permission" to do so by a "superior", a foreign society that has not had any impact upon their own personal childhoods and lives. But at the same time I do understand and realize how powerful the lure can be, when a homicidally enraged victim of society is offered the opportunity to commit murder, and informed that as long as he only obeys his superiors, the murders will be decreed perfectly legal and appropriate, with the murderer facing absolutely no threat of punitive punishment or moral/cultural condemnation.

Wars, just like hunting, the death penalty, abortion, euthanasia, in past decades lynching, public hanging of "criminals", burning "witches" to death at the stake, etc..., are specifically marketed by societies and governments, as being a legitimate and appropriate expression and release of individual, homicidal rage. Societies try hard to get their tortured child victims to agree to commit legal murders, rather than illegal murders. To join the military, to go hunting, to sadistically revel in the death penalty, to kill their womb-trapped babies. A majority of all people who would label themselves as being "hard-core patriots, ready, eager, and proud to defend my country with my life", are in reality, at their emotional cores, on a subconscious level, obsessed with and desperately eager to do one thing: Kill fellow human beings. The only caveat is that many of them feel they must have the permission of and an order from their society to kill, in order to find the hypocritically invalid moral justification within their own perceptions of reality, to actually commit the murders that they spend their lives subconsciously obsessing over and lusting for. Understand this Truth, folks. The "heroic soldier" who receives a ticker-tape parade, medals from his government, and societal praise, for his exploits as a "sniper", "gunner", etc..., is in reality nothing more than a homicidal torture victim of the very society that is perversely heaping praise upon him for murdering complete strangers on it's behalf, via a genocidally evil and immoral war that it chose to initiate, participate in, and sponsor. The "illegal" murderer, who directs his homicidal rage in a much more rational manner, towards the society that created him, is demonized and punitively punished, while the legal murderer, who in a far more irrational manner agreed to mass murder total strangers on behalf of the society that victimized him, is praised and honored and rewarded. The hypocrisy of this is mind-boggling!

Even more so when you consider that the exact same personal motivation, a True Reality need for cathartic vengeance through murder, for personal suffering and victimization inflicted by the society, is the primary reason for why both of these people decided and chose to commit the murders that they did. The legal murderer simply embraces more societal lies and brainwashings, than the illegal murderer, who is rational enough to be able to see and accept the fact that a far more appropriate target for his rage than "enemy" humans that his diseased society chooses to demonize for him, is his own society, the society that is guilty of and responsible for his victimization. The notion that the "legal" murder is somehow morally justifiable, while the illegal murder is a terrible crime that must be punished, is utterly ludicrous when considered and analyzed from any type of a sane, unbiased perspective.

Mass murdering total strangers is not a crime, if your government orders you to do so on it's behalf. But mass murdering total strangers is a terrible crime, if you exercise your own free will in terms of choosing to do so on your own, without governmental permission. Do you creatures realize how ludicrous this is, from any sane viewpoint?? And on top of everything else, from any type of a moral perspective, the "mindless" murder of complete strangers done on the command of a "boss", has to be recognized as being much harder to morally justify, especially when you consider that the society and government itself, that orders the murders, is utterly malevolent, to the point of absolute genocide. The very existence of the practice of war within a society, has to be seen by any sane thinker, as constituting a legitimization of all forms and types of murder, within the society, because by definition and by rational analysis, war provides and allows for the literally limitless mass murder of complete strangers, including women and children, and war overtly involves a governmental order to citizens, to commit such limitless murder on it's behalf. There is no other form of murder that is as unjustifiable as governmentally ordered war murder, therefore all other types and forms of murder should be 100% legal, and in fact highly praiseworthy, as long as the society/government in question chooses to continue to participate in wars.

I have already revealed the Forbidden Truth that no society/government deserves to have it's citizens endanger their welfare or lives in defense of the existing regime/government, upon the declaration of a war by the supreme leader of the society. This is because no large, nationalistic human society currently in existence on planet earth, is genuinely benevolent, and no society treats it's own citizens properly, with respect, with value, and in a non-abusive manner. But at the same time, it is clear that some societies are far more toxic and diseased, inflict significantly more harm and trauma upon their citizen-slaves, than other societies do. This brings up the question, if one of the most insane and diseased societies of the world, lets say america, decided to launch a war against one of the least diseased and malevolent societies of the world, lets say Iceland, would the citizens of Iceland have good reason to agree to help their government in the war, by fighting for Iceland, using the argument that they themselves, as individuals, do stand to suffer a significant decrease in their own quality of life, if this most evil and diseased of governments overthrows their far less evil and diseased government, and assumes power over them?

First of all, we need to recognize that the vast majority of wars occur between two governments/societies that are both extremely diseased, and usually fairly equal in terms of their overall maliciousness and inferiority. They may be very different in terms of political ideology and the general lifestyle of their typical citizen-slaves, but they will be very much alike in terms of how they are both inferior and brutally oppressive. America and afghanistan have totally different political/ideological structures, but in terms of how each society is brutally oppressive and genocidally abusive towards their own citizens, there is a remarkable similarity. As I have already stated, when it comes to war, extremely inferior societies, led by inferior supreme leaders, usually seek out a "partner" to engage in the war with, a society/government that is also extremely inferior. It is extremely rare for a significantly less inferior society, like Iceland, to become the chosen target of war, for an extremely diseased society. Secondly, we need to remember that wars are almost always mutually agreeable and mutually provocative endeavors. In most cases, both societies/governments, on some level, want to engage in a war, and they repeatedly incite and provoke each other prior to "officially" declaring war upon each other. A society like Iceland is likely not agreeable to war, they are not looking to engage in a war, and so any initial efforts made by another society to initiate a mutually agreeable war via provocation, would likely be rebuffed by Iceland. The other, more diseased society, would then move on, looking to find some other society that is more agreeable to engaging in a war. This is because the invalid moral illusion of justification has to be maintained in order to win widespread public support for a war, and if the "enemy" society refuses to allow itself to be provoked, refuses to agree to participate in the war, ignores the minor provocations that the far more diseased society attempts, the supreme leader of the far more diseased society will almost certainly abandon his intention to engage in a war with that particular nation, and move on to looking for a more agreeable "war partner".

But it is true that in some very rare cases, an existing extremely diseased society, or more likely a rogue gang of extremely enraged people looking to create a society of their own by seizing land, will initiate a war against a significantly less diseased society. In such a situation, I guess the logical thing to do would be for the citizens of the less diseased society to rationally decide, on their own, with no governmental coercion or propaganda, whether or not the harm that they themselves feel they would experience if they allowed their existing government to be overthrown by the far more inferior society that had declared war on them, justifies them endangering their own lives by agreeing to fight a war, on behalf of defending themselves, not their supreme leader and not their government, but defending themselves, their own welfare and way of life, from the threat of a significant loss of personal quality of life, if the ultra-diseased society were to become their rulers. An example of this would be the native indians in north america, trying to fight off the genocidal, unprovoked invasion of their sovereign land, by the homicidally enraged European drifters who tragically ended up winning that war and forming the ultra-diseased, supremely malevolent country/society of america. So, I am willing to admit, via my above comments, that in a very few, select situations, as long as absolutely no governmental war promotion propaganda or coercion is involved, the citizens themselves, of a society that is genuinely superior to most, if facing a declaration of war made against them by an ultra-diseased and extremely inferior society, may have a legitimate justification for trying to defend their borders and repel a war attack that is launched against them. But again, over 99.8% of all wars do not even come close to fitting into this unique and extremely rare category.

The notion that wars are not designed to harm and kill women, children, and other "non-military" people living within the demonized society that is being attacked, is simply ludicrous. Wars are campaigns of genocide, and a claim by either party that only "enemy soldiers and military targets" are the intended victims, is nothing more than a blatant lie, given in order to enhance and increase the perception of moral legitimacy among citizen-slaves, that their society is the "good side", fighting a noble battle for moral reasons, instead of engaging in blatant genocide for no valid reason at all, which is in fact the Truth of the matter. The great irony of course, is that almost all front-line military troops are in fact children themselves, 19, 20, 21, 25 years old, utter children in every valid sense of the word, since the vast majority of all human beings barely begin to reach some degree of mental maturity only after the age of 28. Every human being under the age of 28 is a child. And certainly when it comes to making an incredibly difficult, life and death decision, such as whether or not to agree to try and kill complete strangers on behalf of your society, while facing off against complete strangers from the other "side" who have similarly been brainwashed into trying to kill you, complete maturity of the type that most people don't reach until their early 30's, would be required, in any sane society. Soldiers are taught to see and judge the women and children of their "enemy" as being worthless and expendable, objects to be used and abused, even if their actual lives are spared. This leads to sex-crazed soldiers going on group rape rampages against women, and children too, as part of the war ritual. Brutalizing a woman via rape feeds the adrenaline of the enraged, homicidal soldier, whipping him up into more of a killing frenzy, especially if he hasn't had an opportunity to kill adult male "enemy" targets, in the recent past. The most diseased societies, like america, will overtly commit child genocide during their wars, as america has done against Iraq, but never admit to this of course, and insanely blame their demonized enemy and it's leader, such as Saddam Hussein, for "causing" over 500,000 of the children in his country to die, by "refusing to surrender, admit defeat, and accept his humiliation" in the war, even though it is obvious, when looked at from any sane perspective, that the government of america, through it's completely immoral and unjustifiable military and political policies, is completely responsible for and guilty of the Iraqi child genocide that has occurred for the past 12 years and is continuing to occur today.

I've already briefly discussed the issue of "war crimes" in my Crime essay, but lets expand upon this ludicrous judicial notion. According to governmental doctrine, engaging in a genocidal war, trying to kill thousands if not millions of human beings, as a governmental policy, is in no way a crime. However, the brainwashed, tortured children who are compelled to engage in these wars on behalf of their governments, can engage in activity that is criminal in nature, be accused of war crimes, be charged with such crimes, convicted of them and thrown into prison, even when the child-soldier only targeted members of the demonized foreign enemy that their very own society brainwashed them into hating and considering appropriate targets for violence and attack! And so once again, we have hypocrisy that is so blatant, so undeniable in it's scope, that the mind cannot help but be boggled. There is no way that any action undertaken by anyone acting on behalf of the enemy demonization doctrine of their warmongering society, can or should be considered a crime, much less a crime deserving of punitive punishment. War itself is the greatest crime of all, a crime undertaken by governmental and socie